Also the full list of banned individuals is at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_individuals_banned_from_entering_th e_United_Kingdom
Also includes Martha Stewart... Though it does include many US citizens who like Savage believe that the First Amendment applies anywhere in the world. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland Sent: 26 May 2009 09:30 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Britain is now the "savage" nation This is the same Michael Savage who was sacked for wishing aids on a caller... He'll be in the Company of Fred Phelps who pickets military funerals and is also excluded from the UK. The Home Secretary commented on Savage" If you can't live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded." The British have a right to decide who they let come into their country just like the US does and as does every other Country. The US for example won't allow in anyone who has been convicted of smoking a joint... something not illegal in Holland yet the Dutch aren't demanding a judicial review! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: 24 May 2009 03:16 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Britain is now the "savage" nation http://bit.ly/aNJj2 - - - Since 2005, the U.K. has been able to ban people who promote hatred, terrorist violence or serious criminal activity. On May 5, Britain's Home Office released the names of 16 of the 22 individuals who have been placed on the list since October of 2008. The report describes Savage as: "Controversial daily radio host. Considered to be engaging in unacceptable behavior by seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred which might lead to inter-community violence." "This is someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country," said Home Secretary Jaqui Smith about Savage. To place a successful talk host like Michael Savage on the same list as radical Muslim clerics, convicted criminals, and Russian skinheads is beyond outrageous. Yet we hear not a peep being said by the U.S. government and mainstream media in defense of Savage against this outrage. Instead of fighting this unjustified attack against an American citizen, the Obama administration is preparing to mimic the British. Reading the language of the Home Office's release, we couldn't help by see an uncanny resemblance to Janet Napolitano's Homeland Security Report that classified conservatives as extremists. The liberal thought police are on the prowl in London, and the media and the Obama administration are silent and implicitly supporting the British. Can you imagine the outcry and fervor that this travel ban would cause if it had included a leftist talk host such as Rachel Maddow? The media would be up in arms, and the Obama administration would immediately be on the phone with British diplomats to get an explanation. So why is that not happening in the case of Michael Savage? Evidently in the U.K. it is OK to blacklist a white male conservative, if you so much as utter a word of opposition to illegal immigration, homosexuality, or Islamic terrorists. Michael Savage sent a letter to Secretary of State Clinton asking her to plead his case; we doubt that she will listen. He is also suing the British government for defamation for grouping him with all the legitimate criminals and terrorists and "painting a target on my back." Legal experts estimate he has a decent case. In his defense on the air Savage said, ""I have never advocated violence. . . I've been on the air for fifteen years, three hours a day, five days a week -- fifteen years. They [Savage's critics] take a few sound bites that amount to one, two, or three minutes and they try to redefine me by extracting sound bites out of context. I could do that with anyone in the public eye." The mainstream media and the Obama administration are neglecting their duties by not defending Mr. Savage. As much as they may be disagree with Savage's opinions, this type of censorship and blacklisting is threatening everyone's freedom of expression. As Roger Hedgecock says, "The British government action barring Michael Savage is a frightening preview of what we can expect in our own country as the PC police shut down the voices of dissent." If these attempts to intimidate and censor people for their viewpoints are not combated now, freedom of dissent may become a memory. - - - Shame on Rush, Hannity and Beck for not making even so much as a peep about this. Savage is on the "colorful" end of the conservative spectrum, to be sure, but he has never advocated violence of any kind, and in fact has some eclective views that are hard to describe as "right wing." This blacklisting and lumping with terrorists and criminals is outrageous in the extreme. I was flabbergasted when the policy was announced, and the connection to Napolitano's bizarre terror memo is ominous. - Bob [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
