True.. no crime has been committed in America... A crime has been committed in London. The case of the British hacker comes to mind who is being extradited to the US. He committed a crime in the US viz he hacked into US computers in the US hence he can be extradited.
If he's hacked into a US bank in the UK he couldn't face charges in the US, only the UK. Works both ways -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 04 September 2009 19:15 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Dear Leader to talk directly to 'Schoochildren' So you're telling me that if an American Citizen is murdered by a Libyan citizen on the streets of London that America has no right to extradite him? I don't think that's true. --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Geoff <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Dear Leader to talk directly to 'Schoochildren' > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 7:46 AM > you are obviously NOT a lawyer. the > plane crashed in scotland and under law > the crime became a scottish one. america had no say in > jurisdiction - which > probably annoyed you guys as Ive noticed you arent all that > good at > accepting and obeying jurisdictional boundaries. the > scumbag deserved to die > in prison tho > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf > Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Friday, 4 September 2009 8:26 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Dear Leader to talk directly to > 'Schoochildren' > > Adam Buckland wrote: > > Rubbish, The American Attorney General had absolutely > no say in it. > > It was a Scottish crime tried in a Scottish court and > held in a > > Scottish prison. There would have been no extradition > because he had > > been tried for the crimes in the UK and convicted. He > would not have > > been extradited to face charges as no crime had been > committed in the > > US. > > > > Don't know what's wrong with Scotland Michael no one > in the UK > > understands it either. > > > > Where I am at the moment (Turkey) he wouldn't have > been heard of > > again after his trial let alone released on > "compassionate" grounds.. > > > The American Attorney General signed off on > it. He could have asked > > for extradition > > Hi Adam, > > Although I am not a lawyer, it would seem that anyone in > his position > can ask for extradition, and he didn't as far as we know. > There would > have been some justification, in light of the fact that the > flight had > come from Los Angeles and San Francisco with American Crew > Members and > American Passengers, and had also boarded other Americans > as well for > the return to the states, all of whom were killed. > > If he had asked, it might have changed history. > > They wouldn't elect me. The Pete Doctrine would be "Kill > ONE American" > as a country, we destroy your military, your government and > your > infrastructure. If it is the crime of an individual > criminal, you either > punish him sufficiently or send him to us. Or punish him > first yourself > and then send him to us if he is still alive. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
