On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Publius Maximus <[email protected]> wrote: > I want Nick to answer this, because all I ever hear from people who > are for "doing something" is certitudes and platitudes about the > alleged problem. > > I'd like Nick to explain why Copenhagen's attempt to create a "global > governance" and establish the concept of "climate debt" and exempt > India and China is a good idea that will help fix things, and why he's > OK treatying away our Constitutional safeguards in exchange for... > what? >---------------------
>From what I read I thought that Copenhagen's intent was to put a target on China for not only fixing their own problems but to assist other countries as well. In all of your rants about $$$$ I thought that the world was attempting to have China step up to the stage as a financial leader and help other nations. They saw through that didn't they? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
