On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> No I really was interested in the monthly rate for what you were
> selling. If we paid for it I would get a developer back because he
> spends 15% of his time in Net Admin tasks as well as code. My boss is
> still cheap and is semi proud that he can make a buffalo burp when he
> grabs a nickle. Now all of those cost savings over the past 15 years
> has made a pretty good sized outfit. He has 15 people on staff in FT
> roles and we are considering some contractors at this time as well.
Our main market is companies that want to reduce their IT staff, not
grow it. Companies who want to focus on what they do best, rather than manage
servers. I'm sure that if you figured that you were getting 15% of your
developer's time back as part of the deal, that that would be worth at least
450/mo, and you'd get free hardware/electricity/monitoring to boot! You do pay
your devs at least 36K a year, don't you?
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
