On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> And it still is! Currently EMR is trying to get a profession wide > interchange of data but each specialty has its own model and each > individual doc keeps different types of data. Thus, each office has to > have its own customized solution, try sharing data with that! ---------------------- I have to dissagree here Pete. Results are not hard to categorize, organize and share. Of course there has to be data rules that follow the actual results thus both sides are in agreement with what is presented. The new Dr could look at the rules and tweak them to detemine that the proposed diagonsis is inaccuarte. Data coudl be an image of an XRay, or blood test results. One shows the child broke his arm falling out of the tree. The second states that the womand does not have cancer. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
