On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
>> But, I will as you suggested - generate each and every
>> webpage.
>
> In a couple ways, this is the best way to go. You have a basically static
> site, why
> not serve up basically static files? You cut out a lot of per-hit overhead
> that way.
Well, most frameworks handle that via caching; if the page has no
dynamic components, it's rendered once and then held in the cache; subsequent
hits re-serve the same rendering. Dynamic pages are rendered per hit, as is
necessary. This way you get the best of both, but with no additional futzing
around.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
