Talking about Futzing Control...
Sorry to bring up this thread again. But, I'm still trying to explore some
options.
A Good number of years ago - I dabbled in DreamWeaver - and used it to build a
basic website (nothing to do with my current e-commerce sites). However, I
haven't used it for YEARS now, nor do I own it.
So - I was just thinking - is there an Open-Source type tool that would allow
me to build a website? Maybe something similar to DreamWeaver. However, that
being said - I am hoping the tool allows me to not only do the layout and
graphical design - but maybe also has some way to read some kind of datafile(s)
in order to define the content and allow for quickly building the site.
Maybe this doesn't really exist - in the way that I am hoping for - but, I
figured I would give it a shot. And - as I mentioned previously in this message
thread - I'm looking for something relatively simple to use and does NOT have a
Steep learning curve...
I was just doing some research online about it. I even saw some dev. Env.
called NetBeans - which seems to be able to generate CSS type stuff for
webpages. And, I'm on this webpage that lists a bunch of different open source
tools - for webpage design, graphics manipulation and such. However, I'm hoping
to hear of someone's experience here - and any good suggestions that aren't
already on this webpage. The webpage in question is:
http://sixrevisions.com/tools/30-useful-open-source-apps-for-web-designers/
Thanks in advance!
-K-
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VFP and Webpages...
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
>
>>> But, I will as you suggested - generate each and every
>>> webpage.
>>
>> In a couple ways, this is the best way to go. You have a basically static
>> site, why
>> not serve up basically static files? You cut out a lot of per-hit overhead
>> that way.
>
>
> Well, most frameworks handle that via caching; if the page has no
> dynamic components, it's rendered once and then held in the cache; subsequent
> hits re-serve the same rendering. Dynamic pages are rendered per hit, as is
> necessary. This way you get the best of both, but with no additional futzing
> around.
---------------------
I am still looking for that futz control. I want to avoid it's use
from now on!
;->
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts
901.246-0159 cell
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a1409df1...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
