On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >>> But, I will as you suggested - generate each and every >>> webpage. >> >> In a couple ways, this is the best way to go. You have a basically static >> site, why >> not serve up basically static files? You cut out a lot of per-hit overhead >> that way. > > > Well, most frameworks handle that via caching; if the page has no > dynamic components, it's rendered once and then held in the cache; subsequent > hits re-serve the same rendering. Dynamic pages are rendered per hit, as is > necessary. This way you get the best of both, but with no additional futzing > around. ---------------------
I am still looking for that futz control. I want to avoid it's use from now on! ;-> -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
