I've got one ... try this: http://www.microsoft.com/web/umbraco . It's the Visual Web Developer Express paired with the Umbraco CMS platform. Modern and powerful.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: VFP and Webpages... Talking about Futzing Control... Sorry to bring up this thread again. But, I'm still trying to explore some options. A Good number of years ago - I dabbled in DreamWeaver - and used it to build a basic website (nothing to do with my current e-commerce sites). However, I haven't used it for YEARS now, nor do I own it. So - I was just thinking - is there an Open-Source type tool that would allow me to build a website? Maybe something similar to DreamWeaver. However, that being said - I am hoping the tool allows me to not only do the layout and graphical design - but maybe also has some way to read some kind of datafile(s) in order to define the content and allow for quickly building the site. Maybe this doesn't really exist - in the way that I am hoping for - but, I figured I would give it a shot. And - as I mentioned previously in this message thread - I'm looking for something relatively simple to use and does NOT have a Steep learning curve... I was just doing some research online about it. I even saw some dev. Env. called NetBeans - which seems to be able to generate CSS type stuff for webpages. And, I'm on this webpage that lists a bunch of different open source tools - for webpage design, graphics manipulation and such. However, I'm hoping to hear of someone's experience here - and any good suggestions that aren't already on this webpage. The webpage in question is: http://sixrevisions.com/tools/30-useful-open-source-apps-for-web-designers/ Thanks in advance! -K- -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VFP and Webpages... On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >>> But, I will as you suggested - generate each and every >>> webpage. >> >> In a couple ways, this is the best way to go. You have a basically static site, why >> not serve up basically static files? You cut out a lot of per-hit overhead that way. > > > Well, most frameworks handle that via caching; if the page has no dynamic components, it's rendered once and then held in the cache; subsequent hits re-serve the same rendering. Dynamic pages are rendered per hit, as is necessary. This way you get the best of both, but with no additional futzing around. --------------------- I am still looking for that futz control. I want to avoid it's use from now on! ;-> -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009001cbb810$b542ea00$1fc8be00$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
