Linda, you wrote

   f=: 13 :'{&_1 1'
but you ment to write
   f=: {&_1 1
- Bo


>________________________________
> Fra: Linda Alvord <lindaalv...@verizon.net>
>Til: programm...@jsoftware.com 
>Sendt: 11:02 tirsdag den 11. december 2012
>Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
> 
>u&n y is defined as y u n
>
>   f=: 13 :'{&_1 1'
>   g=: 13 :'y{_1 1'
>   f
>3 : '{&_1 1'
>   g
>_1 1 {~ ]
>
>Linda
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:49 AM
>To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>
>This might be the same function.
>
>   amr1=:{&_1 1
>   timespacex 'amr1 d'
>0.00586723 4.19514e6
>   ama1=:_1 1{~]
>   timespacex 'amr1 d'
>0.00572077 4.19514e6
>  
>Linda
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:27 AM
>To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>
>All I did was use the definition of bond.
>
>u&n y is defined as y u n
>
>Why are they different functions?
>
>Linda
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:18 AM
>To: Programming forum
>Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>
>The functions you timed are different functions.
>
>
>On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Linda Alvord
><lindaalv...@verizon.net>wrote:
>
>> Here's the surprise.
>>
>>     amr1=: {&_1 1
>>    timespacex 'amr1 d'
>> 0.00563871 4.19514e6
>>
>>    ama=:_1 1{]
>>    timespacex 'ama d'
>> 0.0011887 1.04941e6
>>
>> Does anyone know how to turn off something that makes the keys jump 
>> all over the place in outlook? Some key sends unfinished messages!
>>
>> Linda
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda 
>> Alvord
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:51 AM
>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>>
>> Now that I'm awake, I got a surprise.  I us
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda 
>> Alvord
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:16 AM
>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>>
>> Sorry, it needs and argument.
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda 
>> Alvord
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:05 AM
>> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>>
>>     {&_1 1
>> {&_1 1
>>
>> Roger, you must have typed this incorrectly.
>>
>> Linda
>>
>> Original Message-----
>> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
>> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Roger 
>> Hui
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:40 AM
>> To: Programming forum
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1
>>
>> Also {&_1 1 .
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Roger Hui
>> <rogerhui.can...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > If you really are converting random boolean values to (1,_1) values, 
>> > another possibility is _1&^ or _1^]; i.e. 0 to 1 and 1 to _1.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Brian Schott
>> <schott.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >>    timespacex
>> >> 6!:2 , 7!:2@]
>> >>    am =:_1& (I.@:-.@]})
>> >>    am2=: ((-&1) @ +:)
>> >>    amd=: <:@:+:
>> >>    aml=: _1 + +:
>> >>    d=: 2 6 50000?.@$ 2
>> >>    timespacex 'am"1 d'
>> >> 0.011278 1.05535e7
>> >>    timespacex 'am2 d'
>> >> 0.187884 8.39091e6
>> >>    timespacex 'amd d'
>> >> 0.004365 1.6779e7
>> >>    timespacex 'aml d'
>> >> 0.004874 1.67789e7
>> >>
>> >> It looks like David's method is fastest and Peter's is most lean.
>> >> And Linda's method loses nothing relative to David's.
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> --
>> >> - For information about J forums see 
>> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to