Mike, Yes, I get your new results for ?. on the iPad. That's too bad, and worth remembering, for [email protected]. Thanks.
--- (B=) On Dec 11, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Mike Day <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/12/2012 12:13 AM, Brian Schott wrote: > Is there a better way than the verb `am` to do the following? > > am =:_1& (I.@:-.@]}) > am"1] 2 6 ?.@$ 2 > _1 _1 _1 _1 1 _1 > _1 _1 _1 1 1 _1 > > =============================================== > Here are three other simple ways- my "random" array appears to be different > from yours(!?): > > ((_1 + +:) ; ({&_1 1) ; (_1&^@>:); am"1 )2 6 ?.@$ 2 > +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ > |_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1| > |_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1| > +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ > > > Mike > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
