I wouldn't call it "too bad", it is really a "toggle" ]R=:?4#100 29 8 75 97 ]R=:?4#100 24 40 21 82 ]R=:?.4#100 46 55 79 52 ]R=:?.4#100 46 55 79 52 ]R=:?.4#100 46 55 79 52 ]R=:?4#100 77 9 63 92 ]R=:?4#100 51 92 39 15
It allows you to get constant results to study something other than the random behavior that ? causes. Linda -----Original Message----- From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Brian Schott Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 10:09 AM To: programm...@jsoftware.com Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] convert 0,1 coding to _1,1 Mike, Yes, I get your new results for ?. on the iPad. That's too bad, and worth remembering, for schott.br...@gmail.com. Thanks. --- (B=) On Dec 11, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Mike Day <mike_liz....@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > On 11/12/2012 12:13 AM, Brian Schott wrote: > Is there a better way than the verb `am` to do the following? > > am =:_1& (I.@:-.@]}) > am"1] 2 6 ?.@$ 2 > _1 _1 _1 _1 1 _1 > _1 _1 _1 1 1 _1 > > =============================================== > Here are three other simple ways- my "random" array appears to be different from yours(!?): > > ((_1 + +:) ; ({&_1 1) ; (_1&^@>:); am"1 )2 6 ?.@$ 2 > +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ > |_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1|_1 1 1 _1 _1 1| > |_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1|_1 1 _1 _1 _1 _1| > +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ > > > Mike > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
