Just in case, 2000 (divisible by 400) isn't a leap year either, though my Linux 'cal' claims it was.
PA Linda Alvord wrote:
Don, You bailed me out of this little glitch! Linda i U -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Kelly Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Weekend Puzzle - Age of Groundhog born 2002 2 2 Fortunately, the use of "leap" is valid as long as one doesn't go back past 1901 or ahead past 2099. 1900 and 2100 aren't leap years (Fine tuning of the leap year calculation ). Don Kelly
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
