bob, is this right?

2014 1 1 age 2013 12 31

1 0 1


I would have expected 0 0 1 ?

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, robert therriault <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi PA
>
> I think that Raul's isleap takes this into account and does make 2000 the
> leap year that it should be.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/date/leapyear.html
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:37 AM, PMA <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Just in case, 2000 (divisible by 400) isn't a leap
> > year either, though my Linux 'cal' claims it was.
> >
> > PA
> >
> >
> > Linda Alvord wrote:
> >> Don, You bailed me out of this little glitch!  Linda i       U
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don
> Kelly
> >> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:14 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Weekend Puzzle - Age of Groundhog born 2002
> 2 2
> >>
> >> Fortunately, the use of "leap" is valid as long as one doesn't go back
> >> past 1901 or ahead past 2099.
> >>
> >> 1900 and 2100 aren't leap years (Fine tuning of the leap year
> calculation ).
> >>
> >> Don Kelly
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to