bob, is this right? 2014 1 1 age 2013 12 31
1 0 1 I would have expected 0 0 1 ? On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, robert therriault <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi PA > > I think that Raul's isleap takes this into account and does make 2000 the > leap year that it should be. > > http://www.timeanddate.com/date/leapyear.html > > Cheers, bob > > On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:37 AM, PMA <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just in case, 2000 (divisible by 400) isn't a leap > > year either, though my Linux 'cal' claims it was. > > > > PA > > > > > > Linda Alvord wrote: > >> Don, You bailed me out of this little glitch! Linda i U > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don > Kelly > >> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:14 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Weekend Puzzle - Age of Groundhog born 2002 > 2 2 > >> > >> Fortunately, the use of "leap" is valid as long as one doesn't go back > >> past 1901 or ahead past 2099. > >> > >> 1900 and 2100 aren't leap years (Fine tuning of the leap year > calculation ). > >> > >> Don Kelly > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
