Hi PA I think that Raul's isleap takes this into account and does make 2000 the leap year that it should be.
http://www.timeanddate.com/date/leapyear.html Cheers, bob On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:37 AM, PMA <[email protected]> wrote: > Just in case, 2000 (divisible by 400) isn't a leap > year either, though my Linux 'cal' claims it was. > > PA > > > Linda Alvord wrote: >> Don, You bailed me out of this little glitch! Linda i U >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Kelly >> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:14 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Weekend Puzzle - Age of Groundhog born 2002 2 2 >> >> Fortunately, the use of "leap" is valid as long as one doesn't go back >> past 1901 or ahead past 2099. >> >> 1900 and 2100 aren't leap years (Fine tuning of the leap year calculation ). >> >> Don Kelly > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
