I disagree.  Scalar and vector extensions are so old hat to
you that you have forgotten just what a marvel they are.

I have been working with Ken's 1962 book "A Programming 
Language".  There, it's only multiplication that has the
scalar extension.  And in example after example,
I find myself urging, "Use scalar extension, Ken."
(I say it with almost 50 years of hindsight, said hindsight
provided by the same Ken.)

e.g. http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/APL.htm ,
Section 1.9, 2nd paragraph:  v = (2∊) |0 ⍳1(n)  . 
With scalar extension for |, the expression simplifies 
to v = 2 |0 ⍳1(n)

So my suggestion to Bob is, use a few demonstrations of
scalar and vector extension, including some of the
more unusual functions.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Sherlock, Ric" <r.g.sherl...@massey.ac.nz>
Date: Sunday, February 7, 2010 12:15
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] The Accessible Dictionary
To: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com>

> Yes, looks great, as well as instructive. I like the way you 
> draw the viewer's attention from one part of the screen to another.
>  
> I agree with Tom that repeating all the steps of this animation 
> for other verbs seems like overkill. I wonder it perhaps this 
> one could become an example of argument extension - perhaps with 
> an additional "scene" or two using a rank 3 array to show how it 
> is all about extending the 'items'.
> 
> > From: Tom Arneson
> > 
> > I like it, and believe some music would be a good addition. 
> Just a few
> > of
> > these could be used as samples, that is there would be no need to
> > repeat for
> > other dyadic verbs with the same behavior.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com
> > [mailto:programming-boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of bob 
> therriault> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 10:15
> > To: Programming forum
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] The Accessible Dictionary
> > 
> > Thanks for the sustained effort Ian et al,
> > 
> > Speaking of content rich. Here is a test for animating the + (plus)
> > verb
> > with a variety of arguments. There is no audio (yet!) as this 
> needs to
> > be
> > timed carefully and requires the animation to be locked down.
> > 
> > I welcome comments, this is a first pass.
> > 
> > + (plus) animation
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfvs8o5kmyg
> > 
> > Cheers, bob
> > 
> > On -Feb7-2010, at -Feb7-201012:50 AM, Ian Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > As we compose these content-rich pages, the requirements for the
> > > template will gradually emerge. But no sweat if we don't get 
> it right
> > > first time. So I suggest we just go ahead. Now!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to