I agree with including examples of scalar & vector extensions, the point I was trying to make (perhaps needlessly) is not to repeat *all* of them for every primitive, but to have a separate animation as well that dealt more exhaustively with the topic.
> From: Roger Hui > > I disagree. Scalar and vector extensions are so old hat to > you that you have forgotten just what a marvel they are. > [snip] > So my suggestion to Bob is, use a few demonstrations of > scalar and vector extension, including some of the > more unusual functions. > > From: "Sherlock, Ric" > > > Yes, looks great, as well as instructive. I like the way you > > draw the viewer's attention from one part of the screen to another. > > > > I agree with Tom that repeating all the steps of this animation > > for other verbs seems like overkill. I wonder it perhaps this > > one could become an example of argument extension - perhaps with > > an additional "scene" or two using a rank 3 array to show how it > > is all about extending the 'items'. > > > > > From: Tom Arneson > > > > > > I like it, and believe some music would be a good addition. > > Just a few > > > of > > > these could be used as samples, that is there would be no need to > > > repeat for > > > other dyadic verbs with the same behavior. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com > > > [mailto:programming-boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of bob > > therriault> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 10:15 > > > To: Programming forum > > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] The Accessible Dictionary > > > > > > Thanks for the sustained effort Ian et al, > > > > > > Speaking of content rich. Here is a test for animating the + (plus) > > > verb > > > with a variety of arguments. There is no audio (yet!) as this > > needs to > > > be > > > timed carefully and requires the animation to be locked down. > > > > > > I welcome comments, this is a first pass. > > > > > > + (plus) animation > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfvs8o5kmyg > > > > > > Cheers, bob > > > > > > On -Feb7-2010, at -Feb7-201012:50 AM, Ian Clark wrote: > > > > > > > > As we compose these content-rich pages, the requirements for the > > > > template will gradually emerge. But no sweat if we don't get > > it right > > > > first time. So I suggest we just go ahead. Now! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
