That's a very useful w3.org ref, Bill.

Some really bad clashes there with the alternative naming conventions
we're considering.

Our present aim is a limited one: just to name the ascii J primitives
within our own walled garden.
But one can come in time to rue limited objectives.
Are our page [=primitive] names ever going to have to coexist with
pages for a wider set of symbols?
Even the people who write official PDF-generating software can't get
it right even with ascii, as I've found to my cost with APWJ.
People who doubtless said to themselves "let's call a pound a pound, a
quote a quote, a star a star... 'cos that's what they are."

I had originally thought that people wouldn't have to remember and
type these names.
But of course there's the need for in-line hypertext links to other NuVoc pages.

BTW Haven't we come a long way from the convenience of bare CamelCase
for hypertext links.
Talk about loss of innocence! :)
Was there ever any real need to abandon that simple convention?

Ian


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:10 AM, bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> ĵaŭ, 11 Feb 2010, Skip Cave skribis:
>> Ithink that the proposed charset.ijs looks pretty good, (from the
>> redbook) except I would shorten the following names:
>> 35 # numbersign -> number or numsign,
>> 38 & ampersand -> amp,
>> 39 ' quotesingle -> quotsing,
>> 42 * asterisk -> star,
>> 46 . period -> dot,
>> 94 ^ asciicircum -> hat,
>> 95 _ underscore -> under,
>> 126 ~ asciitilde -> tilde.
>
> I think that 'star' is the 5-corner star that found in APL used for
> exponentiation.
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/bycodes.html
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to