On 2014-05-21 20:57, Luis G.F wrote: > Is your decission, but in my modestly opinion, allow unencrypted > gmail.com connections is dangerous for the jabber network. If you allow > this with gmail.com, sooner or later you will allow too facebook.com or > any other, you will always be a slave from others. Is better for your > users, teach thems to use other jabber service. >
The problem is: a) They no longer care about federation and are slowly breaking it. If we isolate from gtalk, they won't care and they won't fix it. b) The majority of my contacts use google's xmpp. This is probably true for almost everyone else out there, since their userbase is simply colosal. We can't just stop talking to that many users. > > El 21/05/14 19:42, Adrien Clerc escribió: > > Not really. A lot of users are using Google services, including GTalk > > (even if they don't know the name of this service). The problem for us > > is that we cannot afford ignoring what Google is doing, because we > > cannot force these users to use another XMPP service. > > For example, right now, since Google broke its s2s, I cannot speak with > > anyone unless they talk to me first. This is annoying. But I have to > > deal with it… > > > > Adrien > > > -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: No, it doesn't make sense. Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply?
Description: PGP signature