It doesn't happen for me. I tried it with and without a component in focus (w/o causes the inspector panel to be empty)
I'll be very interested to hear how that one gets resolved for you. It's funny, there seems to be two camps: the ones that don't get crashes and the ones that do. I wonder what the dependencies are? > -----Original Message----- > From: vincent mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:07 AM > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs. > > > try this one for stability > > open new schematic > open ispecotr , right clik on the mid pane > > - access violation reading 0x00000004 every time. under win98 - protel > 99se your system would die. DXP on 2000 : close the box and continue . I > have a memory sniffer and resource monitor open . it doesn't even 'leak' > memory ! > > > > Ian Wilson wrote: > > > On 04:09 PM 1/08/2002 -0500, Matt Pobursky said: > > > >> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:20:07 -0400, Watnoski, Michael wrote: > >> >Greetings all, > >> > > >> > Another two cents: > >> > > >> > Protel has been my biggest headache as far as crashes due to > >> >upgrades of other programs. I would expect that if Protel needed > >> specific > >> >versions of .dlls to run, it should have written them and not used the > >> >Microsoft versions that are likely to be updated on a regular > >> basis. I am > >> > >> Actually, they should just put ALL their ancillary config files, > >> required DLL's and such in the Protel owned and created directory. > >> End of problem. > > > > > > Actually it isn't - at least until Win XP came along. Pretty much > > only one DLL of a certain name can exist in memory pre-XP. Win XP now > > allows different versions of a DLL to exist in memory (I think). This > > is the MS solution to DLL hell. > > > >> Again, not very defensive programming practices. > > > > > > Somewhat forced by the OS in this case but I agree that, at least > > historically Protel products have not been very defensive. But do > > remember that the user community was split in 1999 as to whether the > > application should trade speed for stability. > > > > Ian > > > > > > ************************************************************************ > > * Tracking #: 359C05030908664CBC51CCEC9FEA08FC302B19E6 > > * > > ************************************************************************ > > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > _____________ > /____________/ Vincent Himpe > // _____ ___/ Lab Manager > / \ \ / / / ST Microelectronics > /___\ \ / / / 5510 Six Forks Road . Suite 200 > /______//_/__/ Raleigh NC 27612 > > Tel : (919) 850 6070 > Fax : (919) 850 6689 > e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
