It doesn't happen for me. I tried it with and without a component in focus
(w/o causes the inspector panel to be empty)

I'll be very interested to hear how that one gets resolved for you. It's
funny, there seems to be two camps: the ones that don't get crashes and the
ones that do. I wonder what the dependencies are?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: vincent mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:07 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs.
>
>
> try this one for stability
>
> open new schematic
> open ispecotr  , right clik on the mid pane
>
> - access violation reading 0x00000004 every time. under win98 - protel
> 99se your system would die. DXP on 2000 : close the box and continue . I
> have a memory sniffer and resource monitor open . it doesn't even 'leak'
> memory !
>
>
>
> Ian Wilson wrote:
>
> > On 04:09 PM 1/08/2002 -0500, Matt Pobursky said:
> >
> >> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:20:07 -0400, Watnoski, Michael wrote:
> >> >Greetings all,
> >> >
> >> >    Another two cents:
> >> >
> >> >    Protel has been my biggest headache as far as crashes due to
> >> >upgrades of other programs.  I would expect that if Protel needed
> >> specific
> >> >versions of .dlls to run, it should have written them and not used the
> >> >Microsoft versions that are likely to be updated on a regular
> >> basis.  I am
> >>
> >> Actually, they should just put ALL their ancillary config files,
> >> required DLL's and such in the Protel owned and created directory.
> >> End of problem.
> >
> >
> > Actually it isn't - at least until Win XP came along.  Pretty much
> > only one DLL of a certain name can exist in memory pre-XP.  Win XP now
> > allows different versions of a DLL to exist in memory (I think).  This
> > is the MS solution to DLL hell.
> >
> >> Again, not very defensive programming practices.
> >
> >
> > Somewhat forced by the OS in this case but I agree that, at least
> > historically Protel products have not been very defensive.  But do
> > remember that the user community was split in 1999 as to whether the
> > application should trade speed for stability.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> > ************************************************************************
> > * Tracking #: 359C05030908664CBC51CCEC9FEA08FC302B19E6
> > *
> > ************************************************************************
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>      _____________
>     /____________/  Vincent Himpe
>    // _____  ___/   Lab Manager
>   / \ \   / /  /    ST Microelectronics
>  /___\ \ / /  /     5510 Six Forks Road . Suite 200
> /______//_/__/      Raleigh NC 27612
>
>                     Tel : (919) 850 6070
>                     Fax : (919) 850 6689
>                     e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to