There are LOTS of people running P99 on W2K. It's something specific to
your system. I know that's not a lot of help, but at least it lets you
know you're not trying to do something that's impossible. (like running
P99 on DOS for example)

My spectra dongle worked on W2K. (I say "worked" because I'm now using
XP Pro) I had to get some updated flexlm driver from the web. It's a
real b*tch to setup. You have to do it with admin rights, and then make
sure the daemon is loaded properly. I wish they had a s/w key system
like protel. It's very easy to use, and while it doesn't prevent theft,
it does attach the ID to the user, and it would be extremely foolish for
a user to give out their key codes.

IF this message shows up, I'll know we are being censored. (I didn't
have the * in  it the first time)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:32 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] WIN2000 vs P99 vs Spectra vs Camtastic
> 
> 
> Most other app's work with win2k
> So now I like WIN-2000, but this EDA doesn't
> P99 frequently hangs on shutdown
> Camtastic gives this strange "insufficient memory" error when 
> I print (I only have 512 meg) My spectra 8 dongle won't work 
> under 2k. I now constantly dual-boot to WIN98 Has anyone got 
> fixes - the spectra8 is most annoying .. but I have no $$$
> 
> Roger
>


************************************************************************
* Tracking #: F462EF7ADE2BC647830DF9EAE7181D81ECE68557
*
************************************************************************

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to