I don't see how a minor export problem would impede your ability to design
Protel.  If the "bug" actually caused a manufacturing problem or caused a
fabrication  error,  then I
would the first to call it a bug.  How do  you know the ACAD DWG  format
doesn't  support the feature, then the problem isn't Protel but ACAD or some
other problem associated with dwg or dxf. There are one thousand things that
ACAD does wrong with its own dwg and dxf formats.  It hardly worth pointing
the finger at Protel for this one,  yea I might agree with you that it works
or doesnt work like you say, but disagree about labeling it a bug, since it
doesnt impede anything.     Sorry if I  criticized your input just my
opinion....   its a tall order to ask a program to translate flawlessly,
especially into Acad.   I'm with Dennis,  I use Acad to check fit and form.
We use camtastic to export dxf which is more reliable than dwg file transfer
between Protel and Acad


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] New P99SE SP6 bug for the bug list.
> At 03:38 PM 9/25/2002 -0700, Brad Velander wrote:
> >         just discovered this minor P99SE Sp6 bug today.
> Exporting a database
> >to ACAD R13 DWG format (have no time to check other formats), if you have
> >tented vias the exported file ignores the tenting and outputs soldermask
> >voids for all vias.
> There has been some discussion as to whether or not this report is
> "nit-picking."
> As Mr. Velander wrote, this is a "minor" bug. But, if accurate, it *is* a
> bug, that is, program output is not what would be expected. It is not a
> major bug because most of us would not be using AutoCAD to fully
> represent
> a PCB; the workaround may also be easy. Further, there is an export path
> that would be expected to be more reliable: write the Gerber,
> take it into
> CAMtastic, and then output DXF from CAMtastic. But I have used
> AutoCAD and
> DXF very little, only to import board outline or other mechanical
> information from a client.
> As it is a bug, it should be part of any bug database. I think we
> would not
> demand that it be given priority, there are more serious issues, but bugs
> are the most damaging when they are not known. It should be quick
> and easy
> for any of us to confirm that a program's behavior is or is related to a
> known bug, otherwise we can spend a lot of time trying to figure out what
> we are doing wrong....
> Presumably Mr. Velander found this bug because he found it necessary to
> take his data, including solder mask patterns, into AutoCAD. If
> he was just
> playing around, testing the program behavior, then he did not
> waste serious
> time, I'd think. But if he was trying to do real work, this bug cost him
> time. How much does it have to cost before it becomes worthy of attention?
> For every bug that is reported, many bite users who never get around to
> reporting them. Mr. Velander should be congratulated, not criticized.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To leave this list visit:
* Contact the list manager:
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to