Seems that my server was blocking me from this group for awhile so I'll
repost this since the discussion is ongoing.  A simple CPU/video torture
test is to go to the NASA Goes-8 weather satellite,, select all previous 30
images and then animate.  When the animation starts, click on faster until
all the delay is gone.  Image will blur out on the faster CPU's and your
temperatures will start rising rapidly as the video pipeline and the CPU
work to sustain the data flow.  Simple and effective.


Tim Hutcheson

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Daggett [mailto:mdaggett@;]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] [OT] memory testing and benchmarking - programs

If you are running the "torture test" it should be using 100% CPU.  Does the
screen say "Test 1, 400 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of ..." etc.  If you are
using an SMP machine make sure to set the affinity appropriately.

This has been a well documented tool for stability testing in the
overclocking community.  Whether it's a useful tool in your eyes is your own

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:tony@;]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:58 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] [OT] memory testing and benchmarking - programs

I wasn't referring to usage of disk space. Obviously usage of disk space
has nothing to do with memory bandwidth or processor stress testing.

OK, so I downloaded it and it seems to float around 93% CPU, and 15MB.
Still, doesn't seem like it's very stressful on this system. When
Outlook checks for mail it uses more than that! ;)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Daggett [mailto:mdaggett@;]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:36 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] [OT] memory testing and benchmarking - programs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:tony@;]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] [OT] memory testing and benchmarking - programs
> I looked at the link you provided about prime95, and if you
> read the "how it works" section here
> it says:
> "The program runs at the lowest possible priority. You should
> not see any impact on your system's performance. The program
> will use about 8MB of memory and about 10MB of disk space."
> That doesn't seems like much torture to me. :)
> <snip>
> Use of disk space has nothing to do with memory bandwidth or
> processor stress testing. The program's original function is
> to search for Mersenne primes. Its part of a distributed
> computing project just like Bovine, Seti, Genome, Intel's
> Cure, etc.  Therefore since the client is supposed to run at
> the same time you are using your computer it is set to the
> lowest CPU priority so that it does not lag the system while
> you are using it.  When your machine goes idle then the
> program will use all of the available system resources.  The
> "torture test" mode is what is to be used for testing.
> Below are comments from the release notes as to the
> usefulness of the program for stress testing:
>                       STRESS TESTING YOUR COMPUTER
> ----------
> Today's computers are not perfect.  Even brand new systems
> from major manufacturers can have hidden flaws.  If any of
> several key components such as CPU, memory, cooling, etc. are
> not up to spec, it can lead to incorrect calculations and/or
> unexplained system crashes.
> Overclocking is the practice of trying to increase the speed
> of the CPU and memory in an effort to make a machine faster
> at little cost.  Typically, overclocking involves pushing
> their machine to the limits and then backing off just a little bit.
> For these reasons, both non-overclockers and overclockers
> need programs that test the stability of their computers.
> This is done by running programs that put a heavy load on the
> computer.  Though not originally designed for this purpose,
> this program is one of a few programs that are excellent at
> stress testing a computer.
> ---------
> This program is a good stress test for the CPU, memory,
> caches, CPU cooling, and case cooling.  The torture test runs
> continuously, comparing your computer's results to results
> that are known to be correct.  Any mismatch and you've got a
> problem!  Note that the torture test sometimes reads from and
> writes to disk but cannot be considered a stress test for hard drives.
> You'll need other programs to stress video cards, PCI bus,
> disk access, networking and other important components.  In
> addition, this is only one of several good programs that are
> freely available.  Some people report better finding problems
> only when running two or more stress test programs
> concurrently.  You may need to raise prime95's priority when
> running two stress test programs so that each gets about 50%
> of the CPU time.
> Forums are a great place to learn about available stability
> test programs and to get advice on what to do when a problem is found.
> The currently popular stability test programs are (sorry, I
> don't have web addresses for these):
>       Prime95 (this program's torture test)
>       3DMark2001
>       CPU Stability test
>       Sisoft sandra
>       Quake
>       Folding@Home
>       Seti@home
>       Genome@home
> Several useful websites for help (look for overclocking
> community or forum):
>       Also try the alt.comp.hardware.overclocking Usenet newsgroup.
> Utility programs you may find useful (I'm sure there are others - look
> around):
>       Motherboard monitor from
>       Memtest86 from
>       TaskInfo2000 from
> ---------------------------------
> The exact cause of a hardware problem can be very hard to find.
> If you are not overclocking, the most likely cause is an
> overheating CPU or memory SIMMs that are not quite up to
> spec.  Another possibility is you might need a better power
> supply.  Try running MotherBoard monitor and browse the
> forums above to see if your CPU is running too hot. If so,
> make sure the heat sink is properly attached, fans are
> operational, and air flow inside the case is good.  For
> isolating memory problems, try swapping memory SIMMs with a
> co-worker's or friend's machine.  If the errors go away, then
> you can be fairly confidant that memory was the cause of the trouble.
> If you are overclocking then try increasing the core voltage,
> reduce the CPU speed, reduce the front side bus speed, or
> change the memory timings (CAS latency).  Also try asking for
> help in one of the forums above - they may have other ideas to try.
> -------------------------
> Ignoring the problem is a matter of personal preference.
> There are two schools of thought on this subject.
> It is likely that most programs you run will not stress your
> computer enough to cause a wrong result or system crash.  A
> few games stress your machine and a system crash could
> result.  Stay away from distributed computing projects where
> an incorrect calculation might cause you to return wrong
> results.  You are not helping these projects by returning bad
> data!  In conclusion, if you are comfortable with a small
> risk of an occasional system crash then feel free to live a
> little dangerously!
> The second school of thought is, "Why run a stress test if
> you are going to ignore the results?"  These people want a
> guaranteed 100% rock solid machine.  Passing these stability
> tests gives them the ability to run any program with confidence.
> --------------------------
> Q)  My machine is not overclocked.  If I'm getting an error,
> then there must be a bug in the program, right?
>       A)  Unfortunately, no.  The torture test is comparing
> your machines
>       results against KNOWN CORRECT RESULTS.  If your machine cannot
>       generate correct results, you have a hardware problem.
> Q)  How long should I run the torture test?
>       A)  I recommend running it for 24 hours.  The program has been
>       known to fail only after several hours of operation.  In most
>       cases though, it will fail within a few minutes on a
> flaky machine.
> Q)  Prime95 reports errors during the torture test, but other
> stability tests don't.  Do I have a problem?
>       A)  Yes, you've reached the point where your machine has been
>       pushed just beyond its limits.  Follow the recommendations above
>       to make your machine 100% stable or decide to live with a
>       machine that could have problems in rare circumstances.
> Q)  A forum member said "Don't bother with prime95, it always
> pukes on me, and my system is stable!".  What do you make of that?
>       or
> We had a server at work that ran for 2 MONTHS straight,
> without a reboot I installed Prime95 on it and ran it - a
> couple minutes later I get an error. You are going to tell me
> that the server wasn't stable?
>       A)  These users obviously do not subscribe to the 100%
> rock solid
>       But since they are not presently running any programs
> that reveal
>       the hardware problem, the machines are quite stable.  As long as
>       these machines never run a program that uncovers the
> hardware problem,
>       then the machines will continue to be stable.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Daggett [mailto:mdaggett@;]
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:10 AM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] [OT] memory testing and benchmarking - programs
> >
> >
> > Tony,
> >
> > Check out SiSoft's Sandra for a full suite of system
> > benchmarks.  Also if you feel that you might have some faulty
> > memory I'd suggest running a program called "Prime95" for a
> > few days.  The program is very memory as well as CPU
> > intensive because it tried to factor large numbers to find
> > mersenne primes. If your system can withstand the "torture
> > test" feature then you know you have a stable system as far
> > as memory timing, CPU cooling, etc.  The torture test works
> > by factoring numbers of known primes and if the answers
> > computed doesn't correspond with the known solution then you
> > know you have a memory issue.  Its been used widely in the
> > overclocking community (which I used to be a part of for a
> few years).
> >
> > Sandra -
> >
> > Prime95 -
> >
> > Hope that helps.  If you are really into memory performance
> > you should get out your BIOS manual (assuming you have a good
> > BIOS) and learn about some of the advanced memory features.
> > On my workstation at home I have some PC100 running at 133Mhz
> > (Crucial RAM is top notch on the fab) and just by modifying
> > the CAS Latency, Bank interleaving, etc I was able to boost
> > my memory performance just under that of DDR266.  Not bad for
> > a no cost upgrade.  Oh yea... and my system will run Prime95
> > till the cows come home... this is where it pays to get high
> > quality RAM and not the cheap stuff.
> >
> > <-- arguably the best RAM on the market
> >
> > matt
> >

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:proteledaforum@;
* To leave this list visit:
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:ForumAdministrator@;
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to