If I didn't know better (and I don't), I'd say it looks like someone may
have just put an intentional little glitch in the code - But then again,
maybe someone really is that bad a programmer - Why is it happening to more
than a few people at realatively the same time.

On yet a different note, could it be due to too many people attempting to
access a limited number of licenses at the same time - What would Prohel do
if there were two requests for access at the same time (a second request
sent (to the same subroutine or procedure) while the first request was still
being processed (had not returned to from the subroutine or procedure) - Is
the code capabile of handling 2 (or more) requests at the same time, or was
this not anticipated by the programmer.

JaMi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Fifield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:58 AM
Subject: [PEDA] Server Uninstall!?


> Has anybody ever just all of a sudden have Protel uninstall all the
servers
> and licenses?
>
> This happened to a coworker this morning. He was using Protel; went to
open
> a different .ddb and it would just sit there. We had a look at the servers
> list and all except 3 were gone. We looked at the licenses box and it was
> just blank.
>
> I've had this happen to me before but not to this extent, only just a few.
>
> An a related note, the .ddb file I was working on yesterday was missing
from
> the folder that I store it in on the network. I had to get it from the
> backup tape created last night.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Tim Fifield

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to