# Re: [PEDA] "0 Gap" Means Touch or Not?

```I concur that DRC should assure minimum widths are attained.  Further, I
believe DRC should detect angles less than 45 degrees, and also trace ends
incompletely buried in pads, vias pours, etc.  However, it is best to learn
to use the tools in such a way that you always end on centers.  Employing
marginal methods (even though they work most of the time) will eventually
result in getting bit.```
```
Jeff Condit

----- Original Message -----
From: "Abd ulRahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] "0 Gap" Means Touch or Not?

> At 11:33 PM 5/13/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >In theory, A 0 gap between two entites should be regard
> >as connected, but it is very critical, especially in the tangent
condition
> >(Line to circle or arc, and so on), I think regard it as open is more
> >reasonable.
>
> It should actually be caught by the width rule. Yes, there is a
connection.
> Whether on the real PCB there is a connection or not could be difficult to
> predict. If the board is over-etched, the connection may be lost, if it is
> underetched, it might remain.
>
> But the fact is that the connection does not meet the minimum width rule
> for the net. And I suspect that there are some other ways that minimum
> width could be violated that may not be checked. I've never tried it: what
> if a long thin fill was used to make a connection. Is the width of the
fill
> checked?
>
> This report, while not surprising, does point out a DRC deficiency. One
may
> set a rule that the minimum *track* width is 10 mils, and it is easy to
> assume that the minimum *connection* width will therefore be 10 mils. It's
> not the case. Connection width is not measured in 99SE, as far as I know.
> Connections on inner planes can be below 10 mils; in fact, connections can
> be broken on inner planes due to overlap of the clearance flashes. And
> connection width is not measured in the case described, and possibly in
> some others, I haven't checked.
>
>
>
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
```