On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 7:01:33 AM Alex Antonov <[email protected]> wrote:

> I fully second that opinion.  We rely a lot on being able to set explicit
> defaults that are not language defaults (Java 0, "", false, etc).  It
> puzzles me to even think as to why someone might want to take that feature
> away!!!
>
The decision is made to make protobuf easier to implement efficiently in a
lot of other languages that we want to support and for some features like
JSON that we are going to add. I think we can all agree that default value
is a useful feature, but it's not a mandatory feature to protobuf and
creates real problems in the implementation of some languages (For example
some languages may use a simple struct to represent a protobuf message and
there isn't a way to specify default values. Or in the case of JSON, a
client might have no way to know the non-0 default values.)


>
>
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 6:50:37 AM UTC-6, Jeremy Swigart wrote:
>>
>> That sounds like a poor design decision, and one easily readded without
>> breaking anything. If a field doesn't have an explicit default, you use 0
>> or whatever, thereby not breaking anyone not using them, but if an explicit
>> default is provided that is used instead. I am using that feature as well.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to