On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Jeremy Swigart <jswig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand. If a message is a simple struct then the generated > wrapper code would populate it with the default as defined by the proto it > was compiled with wouldn't it? Are you suggesting that the implementation > on different platforms would lack the wrapper objects generated by protobuf? There may be languages whose protobuf implementation would not be able to efficiently support these features. Note that these decisions are not made based on the current languages that we support, but based on that we are going to support a much wider range of languages. > As long as you have that you have the default value. This rationale > doesn't make sense. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
