On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 18:28 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > On 13 July 2015 at 16:23, aconway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 13:03 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > > I don't really know much about Go, so I mainly have questions > > > rather > > > than answers. > > > > > > - What would actually be included in this 'qpid-proton-go' repo > > > vs > > > the > > > existing qpid-proton repo? > > > > The contents of proton-c/bindings/go on branch "go1". Basically the > > Go > > binding source code. > > > > > - Have you looked into how other Apache projects are supporting > > > "go > > > get", if there are any, to see what do they do? > > > > Nope, good point. I've looked at a bunch of google and github > > projects, > > but all pure Go so the tools Just Work. Anyone know of other mixed > > -language projects with a go component? > > > > > I'm not sure how well it would go down with infra to be routinely > > > 'distributing' things directly out of the repo. > > > > I'm pretty sure they're OK with distributing source code out of the > > repo :) Go distributes everything as pure source, so no unusual > > use of > > the repo is implied. > > I mainly meant that developers and interested folks using the repo to > get at the source for inspection and modification isn't necessarily > considered the same as using it as a regular entry point for most > users. For example, we use the mirror system for our actual [source] > releases. That said, if we are discussing a fairly small binding that > probably isn't much of an issue, and as I wondered, perhaps the > github > mirror of the repo might be a useful tool there. > +1, we could certainly do that. That doesn't solve the structural problems but I'll keep digging and head scratching.
> > I have "go get" *almost* working directly out of > > the ASF repo now, but I can't work around all the glitches - in > > particular the documentation browser is a mess. If I could I would > > rather keep it all in the same repo. > > > > > Might be worth > > > discussing with infra. Perhaps we could point folks at the GitHub > > > mirror to alleviate that? Not sure if there are path issues > > > involved > > > with that though. Somewhat looping back to 'what do other > > > projects > > > do?' again. > > > > Good point, I'll ask around and on infra, I may be missing > > something. > > If anyone's interested in brainstorming about the proper way to do > > this > > (esp. anyone who's done Go work) I'd be happy to go over the issues > > in > > painful detail. > > > > > On 10 July 2015 at 16:34, aconway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I would like to create a separte git repo for the proton Go > > > > binding. > > > > > > > > Go provides "go get" to grab online go source libraries, based > > > > on > > > > cloning repos. The go tools assume that each go project has its > > > > own > > > > repo. I have tried to make this work directly from the proton > > > > repo > > > > but > > > > it is a mess and doesn't work properly. > > > > > > > > Any objections or suggestions? > > > > > > > > Anyone got pointers to speed me thru the apache infra process? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Alan.
