On Feb 6, 3:40 pm, "Martin Ström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you other guys think, are you interested in a patch with test
> or would it just be a waste of time? :)
Martin, I like your implementation a lot (especially the
Element.writeAttributes idea, which I think should be added no matter
what) but it's missing two things I like most about Dan Webb's
DOMBuilder:
* Tags as method names. Much easier to do x.DIV(foo, bar) than to do
new Element("div", foo, bar).
* Easy nesting (like "x.DIV( x.P ( x.SPAN() ) )"). DOMBuilder
responds differently based on the number and types of arguments
passed.
I think both these things are critical, or else there's little
advantage over the native DOM methods. Others may feel differently,
though.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
