On Mar 26, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > Regarding the JSON "workaround" - as you call it - the idea was not to > offer a workaround, but to trigger a discussion on whether (or not) > JSON wasn't a more appropriate solution in some cases, and if we > should add toJSON methods for form elements to the framework.
<chuckle> I misinterpreted your intent. Apologies. I'm in favor of JSON serialization for complex objects (excepting arrays at the first level due current method of serialization as hash), so I agree with you on that point. TAG --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
