> Is Base an option for the naming of the parent class?
Just to clarify, we're looking for how to name the equivalent of the
super keyword in Ruby.
(i.e. a reference to the method of the same name in the parent class).
> "initialize" is reserved, why not "extends" too - allowing the "Class"
> > constructor to automatically extend the new class by just looking at
> > the content of "extends".
That's an interesting idea, Just rewrote below to better match the
rest of the syntax. Any pros/cons ?
var Cow = new Class({
Extend: Animal,
Include: [Eatable, Breedable],
initialize: ..
});
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
