> Is Base an option for the naming of the parent class? Just to clarify, we're looking for how to name the equivalent of the super keyword in Ruby.
(i.e. a reference to the method of the same name in the parent class). > "initialize" is reserved, why not "extends" too - allowing the "Class" > > constructor to automatically extend the new class by just looking at > > the content of "extends". That's an interesting idea, Just rewrote below to better match the rest of the syntax. Any pros/cons ? var Cow = new Class({ Extend: Animal, Include: [Eatable, Breedable], initialize: .. }); --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---