On 6/25/07, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can't achieve this in JavaScript. Simply let it go. >
Word. I like Mislav's approach to keep all the OOP functionality in Class. Really don't want anything cluttering up the methods or properties of my classes. No real opinion on the name of the super method as long as it's private (as it is in Alex Arnell's code). Finally, thanks for putting the effort into this... it was the last thing I felt was missing from prototype. I'm glad to see it in the pipeline. - Skip --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
