On 1 Lip, 23:16, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so I hadn't missed anything. You're implementation does not make > Class into a constructor. > > It only fakes the syntax (as my initial proposition did), and does not > permit dynamic inheritance of class methods.
Yes, you're wright. For me it wasn't needed - why to change the Class after it was created? I feel quite strange now, because I have just looked in the source code of the mooTools. I am quite proud and ashamed at once, 'cause I've done it almost the same way as they. Proud - because I've done it myself (didn't seen their code before) :D Ashamed because I was proud of my code, and now I see that I've just reinvented the wheel :P --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
