Hi DK,

OK, so I hadn't missed anything. You're implementation does not make
Class into a constructor.

It only fakes the syntax (as my initial proposition did), and does not
permit dynamic inheritance of class methods.

Too bad...

-- Tobie










--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to