I have no idea why we strive so hard looking for reasons why jQuery is better than Prototype whereas the truth is, when you came across the framework and it worked for you, you didn't bother looking for another as Prototype had already solved many of your problems.
Popularity notwithstanding should not be a gauge for how good a framework is, example *MS Windows* we all know about it we want to move away from it but somehow hooked on to it. One thing that can be done is improve on existing strongholds of Prototype while making it more versatile with more plug-ins or add-ons whichever suits the scenario.From my stand point Prototype for life :-)) On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Karel Minarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > (...) Prototype should strive to be as good as jQuery > > in terms of convenience for non-programmers. > > Could you elaborate on *why* Prototype should strive for that? > > (Is the prime (sole?) reason the "popularity" of jQuery?) > > Karel > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---