Hi,

> I really think the core team at least should consider updating
> the docs

No harm in asking!
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/overview

> It will spare a significant portion of new prototype users from being
> confused about this.

I very much doubt that it's anything like a significant portion.

Happy coding,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available


On Jun 14, 1:09 pm, rasmus <rasmusrniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> On Jun 14, 10:22 am, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't speak for the Core team, but I don't see it happening if none
> > of them have jumped into this thread so far.
>
> Yeah, you are probably right. If they feel things are optimal as they
> are, I really think the core team at least should consider updating
> the docs, documenting this behavior with something like:
> "If no onException is provided exceptions occur silently."
>
> ... and maybe even WHY it has been decided to do it like this.
>
> It will spare a significant portion of new prototype users from being
> confused about this.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to