> Changes to bylaws are usually implemented by the board. They can
> also be put up to vote with the voting members and for larger
> changes, the board will generally take that approach.
> In this particular case, this wasn't deemed necessary,
Thank you, that is an answer to my question.
I disagree. In my opinion the matter is important enough that it
should have been, and still should be, decided by the members.
The reason I think that is that the approval of the PSF's sources of
funding is an important kind of oversight. If the membership is to
give up that oversight, I think it should do so voluntarily and
unambiguously, not because of a decision the board makes by itself.
PSF-Community mailing list