Hi Matt,

This conversation took place on psf-v...@python.org with the voting
members. I  do not know off the top of my head if you are a voting member,
but if you are, you should be able to access to archives here:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/psf-vote

Best regards,

Ewa
Director of Operations
Python Software Foundation
Cell: 415-319-5237

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Dixon Cowles <m...@mondoinfo.com>
wrote:

> Marc-Andre,
>
> > We did consult the existing sponsor members
>
> I'm sorry. perhaps I should have said: I'm surprised that the board
> didn't consult the non-sponsor membership. Can you tell me the
> thinking behind that?
>
> > As I mentioned in the email, the main purpose is to simplify
> > sponsor signup.
>
> That doesn't answer my question. I didn't ask why the idea is a good
> one. I asked why the membership wasn't consulted.
>
> > Overall, the PSF is moving more and more in the direction of
> > trying to engage our members in the operations of the PSF.
> > We're doing this by opening up WGs
>
> That also doesn't answer my question.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSF-Community mailing list
> PSF-Community@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community
>
_______________________________________________
PSF-Community mailing list
PSF-Community@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community

Reply via email to