On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:22:25PM -0500, Joel N. Weber II wrote: > Once lsh is working well, I'm not sure if there will be any particular > reason why anyone would need to use openssh. The biggest thing is that most of the people currently writing to repositories on subversions are already currently using ssh. I don't know that it will be easy to convince them to change. -- There is no sin except stupidity. - Oscar Wilde
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Hugo Gayosso
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Martin Hamilton
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
