On 2/17/14 9:17 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@nokia.com
<mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com>> wrote:
The only process requirement for a FPWD is that the group record
consensus to publish it. However, it's usually helpful if the FPWD
is feature complete from a breadth perspective but there is no
expectation the FPWD is complete from a depth perspective. As
such, if there are missing features, it would be good to mention
that in the ED and/or file related bugs.
I believe things are mostly addressed in a breadth perspective albeit
quite a few issues are still being discussed and sorted out. We are
currently drafting the ED and thought the F2F is sort of a right time
to have a consensus for FPWD but think it'll be nicer if we can make
it even before that to get a wider review as soon as possible.
Given the broad interest in this spec, I think it would be helpful to
move toward FPWD "as soon as possible". Would you please give a "rough
guestimate" on when you think spec can ready for a CfC to publish a FPWD?
-Thanks, ArtB
