On your first question - some major enterprise users would like to present their ideas and concerns about SSL certificate rules, changes, etc. from their perspective, which I know the browsers have wanted (rather than hearing it reported by the CAs who provide the certs to enterprise customers). We are trying to fit their schedules. If we can't make it happen for the Berlin meeting, we will schedule for a future CABF biweekly teleconference.
On the Governance Change Working Group report to the Forum - as Dean says, Virginia plans to participate from the West Coast, so we need this at the end of one of our two days. I believe I was told 30 minutes was sufficient (there will not be a line-by-line review of the Bylaws amendments, but rather a slide presentation of the big issues). Dean/Virginia/Ben - How much time do you want for your presentation? More than 30 minutes? Do you want 60 minutes? -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:23 AM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Cc: Gervase Markham <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] CA/Browser Face to Face Meeting 41 Agenda – Berlin On 08/06/17 00:19, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > I have pasted in below and also attached a draft Agenda for our F2F > meetings in Berlin June 20-22. Chris B: can you give a bit more detail about your session "Website Owners’ Perspectives on SSL Certificate Requirements", so we can prepare for it properly? What are you hoping to get out of the session? Arno: can I ask my usual question about the "Continental Breakfast"? :-) Is this "a few muffins and some fruit put by for those who didn't get anything at their hotel", or is it a proper breakfast such that we should skip hotel breakfast? I don't want to spurn your hospitality, but I also don't want to arrive hungry and find I've misunderstood what's on offer! Kirk: I notice we only have 30 minutes for "Governance Working Group Report – detailed review of draft Bylaws changes", or less if things overrun, as it's at the end of the first day. Particularly if we have open time, could that be moved somewhere where more attention could be devoted to it? I'm sure many people will have thoughts about the results of the GWG's hard work. Thanks all, Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
