> On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On your first question - some major enterprise users would like to present
> their ideas and concerns about SSL certificate rules, changes, etc. from
> their perspective, which I know the browsers have wanted (rather than hearing
> it reported by the CAs who provide the certs to enterprise customers).
>
> To be clear: Several browsers have wanted open participation. I would suggest
> that having CA-selected participants, without explanation (as Gerv had to
> seek) is perhaps detrimental to the productive dialog, in as much as it
> allows the Chair - and CA members - to favour particular viewpoints to the
> detriment of the overall ecosystem.
>
> Might I suggest that it might not be appropriate?
I think we should welcome hearing from certificate users directly.
Kirk: Can you provide a list of certificate users who will be presenting,
including their affiliation? I’m assuming they are attending the F2F at the
invitation of the Chair.
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
