Kirk, Could you clarify your intent? You mentioned "any other enterprise users" - but I believe the goal is certificate users in general (i.e. more broadly than just enterprise).
Is that correct? On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > I will present names and companies once their participation is confirmed. > Yes, at the Chair’s invitation, but I will additionally “invite” any other > enterprise users others may propose to tell their stories. > > > > I’d point out that over the years we have heard from many people and > organizations at our meetings. It’s been very useful. > > > > *From:* Public [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Peter > Bowen via Public > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:35 PM > *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Peter Bowen <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: CA/Browser Face to Face Meeting 41 > Agenda – Berlin > > > > > > On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On your first question - some major enterprise users would like to present > their ideas and concerns about SSL certificate rules, changes, etc. from > their perspective, which I know the browsers have wanted (rather than > hearing it reported by the CAs who provide the certs to enterprise > customers). > > > > To be clear: Several browsers have wanted open participation. I would > suggest that having CA-selected participants, without explanation (as Gerv > had to seek) is perhaps detrimental to the productive dialog, in as much as > it allows the Chair - and CA members - to favour particular viewpoints to > the detriment of the overall ecosystem. > > > > Might I suggest that it might not be appropriate? > > > > I think we should welcome hearing from certificate users directly. > > > > Kirk: Can you provide a list of certificate users who will be presenting, > including their affiliation? I’m assuming they are attending the F2F at > the invitation of the Chair. > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
