I will present names and companies once their participation is confirmed. Yes, at the Chair’s invitation, but I will additionally “invite” any other enterprise users others may propose to tell their stories.
I’d point out that over the years we have heard from many people and organizations at our meetings. It’s been very useful. From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Bowen via Public Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:35 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Bowen <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: CA/Browser Face to Face Meeting 41 Agenda – Berlin On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On your first question - some major enterprise users would like to present their ideas and concerns about SSL certificate rules, changes, etc. from their perspective, which I know the browsers have wanted (rather than hearing it reported by the CAs who provide the certs to enterprise customers). To be clear: Several browsers have wanted open participation. I would suggest that having CA-selected participants, without explanation (as Gerv had to seek) is perhaps detrimental to the productive dialog, in as much as it allows the Chair - and CA members - to favour particular viewpoints to the detriment of the overall ecosystem. Might I suggest that it might not be appropriate? I think we should welcome hearing from certificate users directly. Kirk: Can you provide a list of certificate users who will be presenting, including their affiliation? I’m assuming they are attending the F2F at the invitation of the Chair. Thanks, Peter
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
