Likewise. I even went so far as to say the same to Fred Wilson, without response. Very disappointing -- I'll repeat myself here -- I don't know that I can imagine a more bitter hypocrisy than Twitter's behaviors of late toward the development community. I understand protecting your investment, but I also understand integrity and graciousness.
∞ Andy Badera ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:19 AM, tyler gillies <[email protected]> wrote: > as ive said to a friend fairly recently > > f*SK twitter ;) > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Julien Genestoux > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We (superfeedr) have created a hub exactly like this : we susbcribed to >> the right users with the streaming API (that they've had for months), and >> rebuild the feeds from it. It's technically fully fonctionnal. >> I got in touch with Ryan Sarver and John Kalucki who said that this hub >> would be breaking their TOS (which specifically mentions that we can't >> redistribute/resyndicate/republish the data) and that if we turn it on, >> they'd probably shut our access down. I believed this is more or less what >> happend to GNIP last year. >> Since I hate building things that are not "durable" and I don't want to >> piss off people with false expectations, I never turned it on. If Twitter >> ever changes their TOS or is even willing to discuss this specific matter >> with us, we're more than happy to turn this hub on. >> Cheers, >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:54 AM, tyler gillies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> im surprised superfeedr just doesn't get firehose access and create their >>> own twitter hub >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Kevin Marks <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> sitting at their hackathon, the stream is the same continuous flow of >>>> JSON structs as the others are. You could use it to send updates to a PuSH >>>> hub. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jeff Lindsay <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Which also makes it possible for people to publish as PuSH .... >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Jud Valeski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> just means that they're moving more and more funx over to the >>>>>> streaming model (not PuSH). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Didier Durand >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anybody know if the announcement of yesterday by Twitter (see >>>>>>> http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/14/twitter-user-streams-annotations/) >>>>>>> means that they are coming to Pubsubhubbub ? >>>>>>> They mention "real-time notifications", no "more polling", etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks by advance for your hints >>>>>>> didier >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeff Lindsay >>>>> http://progrium.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Everyone Loves Tea >>> http://www.everyonelovestea.com >> > > > > -- > Everyone Loves Tea > http://www.everyonelovestea.com >
