@ev used both the words "open" and "distributed" to describe twitter in his keynote
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Julien Genestoux < [email protected]> wrote: > These are business considerations... not tech. They could setup the exact > same model/limitation/priceing with pubsubhubbub! > -- > Julien Genestoux, > > http://twitter.com/julien51 > http://superfeedr.com > > +1 (415) 830 6574 > +33 (0)9 70 44 76 29 > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Eric Mill <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's about more than protecting your investment - supporting a REST >> API over existing resources is one thing, but supporting a free >> streaming API to the firehose, on the scale of Twitter, is a whole >> nother matter. I don't know that the dividends by offering a >> completely free streaming API and expanding the user and developer >> base (like the REST API does) would be worth the incredible bandwidth >> costs they would incur by doing so. >> >> -- Eric >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Likewise. I even went so far as to say the same to Fred Wilson, >> > without response. Very disappointing -- I'll repeat myself here -- I >> > don't know that I can imagine a more bitter hypocrisy than Twitter's >> > behaviors of late toward the development community. I understand >> > protecting your investment, but I also understand integrity and >> > graciousness. >> > >> > ∞ Andy Badera >> > ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice >> > ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private >> > ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:19 AM, tyler gillies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> as ive said to a friend fairly recently >> >> >> >> f*SK twitter ;) >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Julien Genestoux >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> We (superfeedr) have created a hub exactly like this : we susbcribed >> to >> >>> the right users with the streaming API (that they've had for months), >> and >> >>> rebuild the feeds from it. It's technically fully fonctionnal. >> >>> I got in touch with Ryan Sarver and John Kalucki who said that this >> hub >> >>> would be breaking their TOS (which specifically mentions that we can't >> >>> redistribute/resyndicate/republish the data) and that if we turn it >> on, >> >>> they'd probably shut our access down. I believed this is more or less >> what >> >>> happend to GNIP last year. >> >>> Since I hate building things that are not "durable" and I don't want >> to >> >>> piss off people with false expectations, I never turned it on. If >> Twitter >> >>> ever changes their TOS or is even willing to discuss this specific >> matter >> >>> with us, we're more than happy to turn this hub on. >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:54 AM, tyler gillies <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> im surprised superfeedr just doesn't get firehose access and create >> their >> >>>> own twitter hub >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Kevin Marks <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> sitting at their hackathon, the stream is the same continuous flow >> of >> >>>>> JSON structs as the others are. You could use it to send updates to >> a PuSH >> >>>>> hub. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jeff Lindsay <[email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Which also makes it possible for people to publish as PuSH .... >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Jud Valeski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> just means that they're moving more and more funx over to the >> >>>>>>> streaming model (not PuSH). >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Didier Durand >> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Does anybody know if the announcement of yesterday by Twitter >> (see >> >>>>>>>> >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/14/twitter-user-streams-annotations/) >> >>>>>>>> means that they are coming to Pubsubhubbub ? >> >>>>>>>> They mention "real-time notifications", no "more polling", etc. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks by advance for your hints >> >>>>>>>> didier >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -- >> >>>>>> Jeff Lindsay >> >>>>>> http://progrium.com >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Everyone Loves Tea >> >>>> http://www.everyonelovestea.com >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Everyone Loves Tea >> >> http://www.everyonelovestea.com >> >> >> > >> > > -- Everyone Loves Tea http://www.everyonelovestea.com
