-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 May 2008, James Turnbull wrote: > > I think we might as well try it. Even if it's not used to actually > > approve patches, it would hopefully be a useful way to get more people > > looking at the code and commenting on it. > > I like the idea personally - mostly because I want to feel somewhat > confident that patches - some of which I don't understand as well as I > could or pertain to type/providers that I don't use - are at least > partially reviewed. I find having the patch in your face in your email > seems to make people look more closely.
+1 Regards, DavidS - -- The primary freedom of open source is not the freedom from cost, but the free- dom to shape software to do what you want. This freedom is /never/ exercised without cost, but is available /at all/ only by accepting the very different costs associated with open source, costs not in money, but in time and effort. - -- http://www.schierer.org/~luke/log/20070710-1129/on-forks-and-forking -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFINrS6/Pp1N6Uzh0URAnRxAJsEEB0MyPP7jBD45Lu9xPBWWkPLyQCfWru8 6LVMmVcE6ikrlN5ohcPNYBw= =50H7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
