On 10/26/07, Brian Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Basically you are looking at 16.6ms latency vs. 1.1ms latency. It's > big difference as a percentage, but it's better to evaluate each of > those latency amounts in a meaningful context to understand the > difference between the two then it is to just compute some number. For > instance, 13500fps would be better than 900fps cause 900fps would have > 15 times the delay, right? but arguing for 13500fps over 900fps in > order to make a better game would be a pretty ridiculous argument
Yes. I'm just saying there is a slight (though meaningless) advantage to having really high framerates.
