On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Woelz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd prefer that the whole thread about the future of pyglet and > related issues remain in this group since the _users_ of pyglet are > the ones that are needed to keep the development of this library. > Also, I think the users should know what is going on with the library. > At least I want to keep track of the changes, even though I'm not > planning on helping the development. That is fine as long as we are talking about the maintenance-style development that has been happening so far. If development accelerates (or if feature-creep occurs), there is a good chance that the mailing list is going to be flooded with hundreds of low-level discussions which don't affect the users of the stable branch. -- Tristam MacDonald http://swiftcoder.wordpress.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
