On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Woelz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd prefer that the whole thread about the future of pyglet and > related issues remain in this group since the _users_ of pyglet are > the ones that are needed to keep the development of this library.... I agree, but this point is unrelated to my post which started this thread, so maybe I should clarify: you are favoring one pyglet mailing list rather than two, whereas my original post is about getting back to one main svn branch in the code repository rather than two. - Bruce --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
